| Resources |
| This
follows on from the essay exercise in Building a Strategy
for Sustainable Management |
 |
| Aim |
| To
assess your ability to communicate your views on fisheries
management. |
 |
| Task |
| Seminar
presentation |
 |
| Assessment
C: criteria and marking |
| Seminars
present an opportunity for students to communicate using
spoken language. The presentation may be individual or
group, but the marking schedule is the same for both.
|
 |
| Assessment
criteria (communication) |
 |
Level
1: Communicates information. |
 |
Level
2: Communicates relevant information. |
 |
Level
3: Communicates relevant information clearly. |
 |
Level
4: Uses appropriate ways to communicate relevant information
clearly. |
 |
Level
5: Uses appropriate ways to communicate relevant information
clearly. Presentation has impact. |
 |
| Marking
schedule |
 |
Level
1: Presents some information. Poorly read, poorly prepared
or not completely relevant. |
 |
Level
2: Presents information relevant to the topic. Clarity
obscured by lack of fluency, poorly organised material,
etc. |
 |
Level
3: Presents information relevant to the topic. Information
is clear because of logical sequence of points, fluency,
delivery, etc. May still be largely read. Interaction
with audience lacking or not effective. Use of visual
aids lacking or not effective. |
 |
Level
4: Presents information relevant to the topic. Information
is clear because of logical sequence of points, fluent
delivery, etc. Avoids too much reading from notes. Interaction
with audience is quite effective. Appropriate use of visual
aids. |
 |
Level
5: Presents information relevant to the topic. Information
is clear because of logical sequence of points, fluent
delivery, etc. Only brief reference to notes. High interest
and audience involvement by such things as interaction,
visual aids, humour, etc. |
 |
| Assessment
criteria (teamwork) |
| This
exercise also gives the opportunity to assess your students'
ability to work as part of a team. It is probably better
not to tell students they are also being assessed for
team work because this could make them too self-conscious.
Suggested assessment criteria are: |
 |
Level
1: When encouraged works as part of a team. |
 |
Level
2: Works as part of a team. |
 |
Level
3: Works effectively as part of a team. |
 |
Level
4: Works effectively as part of a team and contributes
to decision making. |
 |
Level
5: Works effectively as part of a team, contributes to
decision making and encourages others' participation. |