ST*Rfish home
Ship
ST*Rfish home
Economics Teachers' Notes
Teachers' Notes
Introduction
Activity A Answers
Activity B Answers
Activity D Answers
Activity E Answers
Activity G Criteria
Students' Activities
Fact Sheets
Resources
News Stories
Fish Catch Info
Glossary
Photos
Downloads
Winking Fish


Activity D: relating catch and effort

Resources
Background Information

Suggested answers
1 Conservation.
2

The effort corresponding to MEY offers the greatest level of profit because at this point (E4) marginal revenue equals marginal cost. If effort is increased, the additional revenue is less than the additional cost (MR>MC). Conversely, if effort is decreased, the cost savings are less than the revenue foregone (MC<MR). Thus at MEY, the difference between the value of the catch (TR) and the cost of harvesting (TC) is maximised.
Graph 3a - costs vs effort
   Graph 3a

3
a Fishers make more profit, (R2 - C) > (R1 - C), but effort and catch do not necessarily increase (EMEY1= EMEY2).
b Fishers cut back on effort (EMEY2 < EMEY1) and their catch decreases and profits decline (R1 - C1) > (R2 - C2).
4 The advantage of the QMS for commercial fishers is that they decide when and how (within limitations) they can catch their ACE. Their share is guaranteed, so they can confidently invest in boat, gear and technology. As they are not competing with others for fish, they can invest in selective catching methods and value-added processes, rather than in technology to catch fish faster than other fishers.
5 A competitive TACC means fishers compete against each other and some fishers probably do well out of this system. However, it leads to a technology race to build bigger and better boats, which are used only until the fishery is closed for the year.
6 The QMS and a competitive TACC both conserve fish, but the QMS is more efficient in terms of capital investment and employment.
Graph 3b - costs vs effort
   Graph 3b

 

Introduction | A | B | D | E | G
Top of page top
Back Next